He was concerned with the monologue rather than dialogue that was going on during this time in Alabama; where each side would talk about the Here the audience sees that King addresses the problem of “shallow understanding from people of good will,” saying that “lukewarm acceptance is more bewildering than outright rejection” (470).Tags: Assignment IntroductionCan You Change Your Personal Essay Common AppDissertation Proposal TemplateBusiness Planning ServicesOvercoming Difficulties In Life EssayIs Hell Exothermic Or Endothermic EssayTwo Short Argumentative Essays
He pointed out how Negroes suffered unjust treatment in Birmingham court and how Negroes were threatened by bombing.
King showed the necessities of taking demonstration in Birmingham so that he could dispel the doubts from society (King).
Perhaps the South, the nation, and the world are in dire need of creative extremists… In the same way, he assimilated himself to Jesus Christ, who “was an extremist for love, truth, and goodness.” There were several reasons that King used biblical figures.
First, King was a clergyman who knew much about biblical figures which were authentic for him.
Negro leaders could only choose direct action to “create such a crisis and foster such a tension,” in order to “dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored.” Therefore, there were no equitable reasons that clergymen or Birmingham government should stop their non-violent direct action (King).
Argumentative Essay On Letter From Birmingham Jail
There were so many Biblical figures and authorities uses in this article. left their villages and carried their “thus saith the Lord” far beyond the boundaries of their home towns, and just as the Apostle Paul left his village of Tarsus and carried the gospel of Jesus Christ to the far corners of the Greco-Roman world, so am I compelled to carry the gospel of freedom beyond my own home town.
Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is an excellent example of an effective argument; it was written in response to an editorial addressing the issue of Negro demonstrations and segregation in Alabama at the time.
He writes in a way that makes his argument approachable; he is not attacking his opposition, which consists of eight Alabama clergymen who wrote the editorial.
He incorporates credible sources, prime examples, and refutes any argument that the clergymen might have.
King proves himself and his argument through examples, and he answers every aspect of the clergymen’s letter, making his argument a strong and informative one.