Tags: My Algebra HomeworkMla Research Paper QuotingBeethoven Deaf EssayHow To Write A Comparison Essay IntroductionBusiness Resumption Plan TemplateFortran Array AssignmentHow To Solve Word Problem In MathematicsThesis Statement For NursingDo My Calculus Homework
We are exhorted by the apostle John to "test the spirits to see whether they are from God" (1 Jn. Taking heed to the apostle's words, this paper is an attempt to determine the true nature of the language used in the gift of tongues.It will be argued in this paper that the biblical gift of tongues was, in fact, a known human language, though unknown to the speaker.
The tongues spoken within the charismatic movement today have been carefully examined by linguistic scholars and found not to be a real human language at all but rather unintelligible utterances (see Appendix below).
But is there any solid evidence in the Bible for the gift of tongues utilizing unintelligible speech?
1) The second clear instance of speaking in tongues occurs with Cornelius and his household in Acts -48.
As Peter was preaching, the gift of the Holy Spirit was poured out upon Cornelius and his household.
b) The word "tongues" best refers to foreign languages for the following reason: 1) Acts 2:6 states that the multitude who heard the tongues being spoken were bewildered, "because they were each one hearing them speak in his own language ." Thus, this verse clearly states that the disciples were speaking the various languages of those who were gathered. Also, consider that these men who were listening were from many different countries (15 countries are listed in vv.
Essay On Speaking In Tongues
9-11) and yet they clearly heard the disciples "speaking of the mighty deeds of God" (v. Here again we find a clear reference that the miracle at Pentecost was that the disciples were speaking in the people's native "tongues" and telling of the mighty deeds of God.3) We are now in a better position to evaluate the meaning of the word glossa translated "tongues" in its plural form in Acts 2:4, 11. 5:9; 7:9; ; 11:9; 13:7; 14:6; ; see also heteroglossos in 1 Cor. There should be no doubt that the use of glossa in Acts 2:4 and 11 also refer to human languages.All lexicons affirm that one of the common uses for this word is to refer to human languages (cf. The context (see above) supports that the disciples were speaking in languages which were unknown to them personally, but which were the native tongues of many of the visitors gathered at the time of Pentecost.This, many believe, is the kind of tongues found in the remainder of Acts and in 1 Corinthians 12-14.As we begin to examine this view, we will start with an evaluation of the other notable occurrences of tongues in the book of Acts.Kerber addressed the rise of a new disciplinary identity which was founded upon the paradigm of diversity.INTRODUCTION The charismatic movement has sparked many controversies within the church today.Thus, the evidence supports the conclusion that the tongues at Pentecost were not ecstatic speech but known human languages. The argument is made by some charismatics that once one leaves the unusual circumstances of Pentecost, we actually see a different kind of tongues being manifested, i.e., an ecstatic speech of unintelligible sounds which is unrelated to any human language.They refer to this gift of tongues as being a miraculous language which is used in heaven between God and the angels, or as the language of the Spirit which man may attain in prayer as he is seized by the Spirit and caught up into heaven.Thus, the "tongues" of Acts 2:4 and are the same as the "languages" of Acts 2:6 and 8, and all refer to human languages.3) To hold that the "tongues" in Acts 2:4 was some kind of ecstatic speech would contradict its usage in Acts where it clearly refers to human languages. " Clearly here we have Peter speaking to his kindred in their own language.