Tags: Sample Of Argumentative Essay ExampleResearch Paper On Language And CultureDeath Penalty Essay TitlesBusiness Plans For EntrepreneursGood Introduction Words For EssaysQuotations At The Beginning Of Essays
This demonstrates the ease with which individuals can come in possession of a gun in the U.S., as this respective bank treated the gun topic as if guns were no different than objects that people use on a daily basis.
A title that will belong to Columbine until April 16, 2007 when a student at Virginia Tech killed thirty-two students.
"Bowling for Columbine" reminds us that this is a society where more than 11,000 people die every year from guns, where TV news and entertainment programs produce violent images, where banks give away rifles to customers, and where the public lives in fear of being robbed and killed. You only have two hands so what is the point of Americans owning so many guns in there homes?
It would be perfectly normal to stand up and criticize the contemporary gun culture in the U.
S., but this needs to be done using calculated strategies and simply accusing third-parties is unlikely to generate positive results.
Many aspects of the film are exaggerated in order to intensify the message it is meant to put across.
"The charges against Bowling for Columbine are essentially the same as for Roger and Me: factual errors and inaccuracies, exacerbated by manipulative editing using cut and paste for satirical purposes, at the expense of serious exposition of content and substantial, fair, political argument." (Chapman 151) While Moore's purposes are admirable, it is nonetheless disturbing to acknowledge that many viewers are probable to get the wrong idea as a result of seeing the film.
This actually proves that simple Americans such as the people working for the bank see nothing wrong with associating concepts like a bank account and a rifle, this proving that the gun culture pervaded every aspect of the American culture up to the point where public institutions give out deadly weapons to their customers as if they were kitchen appliances.
This scene generated much controversy however, with critics pointing out that Moore staged the moment when he was given the gun and that one would apparently have to meet certain requirements such as a thorough background check to see if the respective person was entitled to own a gun (Schultz 181).
In his attempt to influence people to want justice, Moore acted in disagreement with a person's right to be free of disgrace and indignity.
"The question becomes an extremely important one as we train students in the techniques of documentary only to unleash them and their cameras on an unsuspecting public." (Pryluck 21) The director virtually wanted to bring to light information that was easily hidden from public view and this meant that he had to express little to no interest in Heston's well-being.