Some radical proposers to the ban, who also support a total ban on the use of tobacco, further cite the effects that smoking has on the health of the smokers themselves.On the other hand, opponents of the ban argue that if smoking in public places should be illegal then cigarettes would be illegal or contraband products.Tags: Introduction Guidelines Research Paper3 Of Dissertation WritingIllustration Essay On DrinkingHow To Write Position PaperMedical Office Administration Cover Letter No ExperienceEssay Planning ProcessCovering 3d Letters With FabricTerm Paper Theology
In fact, it is deemed as one of the most profitable and stable segments of the agriculture sector in Greece earning the farmers an average of 7,000 – 10,000 euro per hectare and during the recent economic downturn, only 25% of the total jobs lost were lost in the tobacco industry (Hahn et al, 2009).
Tobacco employs most of the residents of northern Greece both directly, through cultivation of the crop, and indirectly, mainly in the processing, sales and distribution of the finished product.
On the flipside, research has also revealed a lot of negatives about smoking especially in public places.
It has been proven that second hand smoke can cause breathing problems to non smokers (Hahn et al, 2009).
Nowadays people see such positive way in e-cigarettes as alternatives to the traditional tobacco cigarettes.
A popularity of e-cigarettes and their widespread image as a harmless alternative to the traditional tobacco cigarettes could be the reason why there is quite a high number of studies which consider the harmfulness of the e-cigarettes.It is common knowledge that the ban of smoking in public places is majorly for the protection of non smokers from the side effects of smoking, but there are other factors which inform the decision to impose a ban on smoking in public places (Robbins 38).This paper seeks to investigate both the benefits and side effects of smoking in public and finally argue a case for or against the ban on smoking in public places.Some opponents also say that the general public has no reason to think that everybody’s natural goal is or must be to maximise their lifespan.There are several economic benefits directly attached to the production and sale of tobacco in many parts of the world.Proponents of the ban of smoking in public places argue that because not everyone is a smoker, the smell of cigarette smoke is offensive to non-smokers.They also cite the health effects that second hand cigarette smoke has on the non-smokers who are fond of being around smokers.Some of them go as far as arguing that there are more harmful environmental hazards like industrial smoke, motor vehicles exhaust fumes and smoke resulting from the burning of trash or garbage (Sloan 85).These, they argue, have greater environmental effects than just smoking.This happens when a non smoker, especially one who is allergic to smoke, inhales the smoke exhaled by the smoker and the smoke reaches his or her respiratory system causing itchiness in their systems thereby causing inflammations in the lungs resulting in difficulty in breathing problems and sometimes respiratory diseases.Second hand smoke also causes eyesores especially to non smokers who are allergic to smoke (Shetty, 2009).