Tags: Pope An Essay On Man SummaryColleges For WritersOracle Pl Sql Case StudiesBook Report Sheet For First GradeCreative Writing For Grade 5Problem Solving And Decision Making ExamplesEssay About Learning From MistakesComparison And Contrast Order Essay
Basically the original objective / hypothesis confuses the reader.But I'm sure other people may have different opinions on this, anyone care to comment .... Also showing that you can constructively criticise your methodology shows that you have matured and developed as a researcher.My supervisor is not happy with this as comes across that the experiment failed (which it did!
Basically without going to go into the nitty gritty details, the story i have written the chapter in the following vein: We conducted an experiment and hypothesised a certain result.
We did not find the hypothesised result, but we did find something else which is interesting but is not related to the original aims.
A failed experiment design for one aim produced some interesting results. If I remodel the aims to fit the findings, it will ruin the logical flow of the thesis...
Assuming you repeated the experiment many times, you then actually DID use this design for a new aim, and a set of results. One thing that was suggested was that i remodel the aims into a very basic broad aim, that will encompass the expected findings and the actual findings. as the methodology of this chapter is a mixture of established (experimental) methods and new (analytical) methods.
You may get a question about your original methodology in your viva - might be worth preparing for that and thinking about which alternative methodology you would have used if you could do it again (and other research directions you could take).
I'd say that many Ph D students have the same experience. It sounds like you've already identified issues with the methodology and, as long as you're able to justify why this was found to be the most suitable method at the time, you should be fine.
I just want to ask for some impartial advice from anyone who has been in this situation (preferably someone who has gone through and survived the viva!
) Have people gotten through their viva when the data doesn't match up to their hypotheses, or that the method which they thought was appropriate later turned out not to be inappropriate?
The reason the original hypothesised results were not found were because of assumptions initially made in designing the experimental paradigm were (with the benefit of hindsight) incorrect.
Some suggestions for adapting the paradigm to identify the initially hypothesised effect are suggested.